CCSC statement on CATS and ICATS

January 2007

Primary Care Trusts in Cumbria and Lancashire have issued a consultation seeking the public’s views on the establishment of a Clinical Assessment, Treatment and Support (CATS) service in Cumbria and Lancashire.

Plans to roll out a similar scheme in Greater Manchester are also underway. This is called Integrated Care Assessment and Treatment services (ICATS) and it will also be provided by the independent sector.

These services are a radical development whereby the independent sector will provide triage, assessment, diagnostic and some treatment services in a number of specialties, outside local acute trusts, on referral from GPs. The specialties are: -


The preferred bidder in Cumbria is Netcare UK, an independent sector provider which already operates a number of treatment centres and primary care walk-in centres in England.

This scheme’s stated aim is to help reduce waiting times, so that the area can achieve the 18 week waiting time target by 2008. It is also intended to push forward the “care closer to home agenda” – the Government’s intention to move more care traditionally provided by hospitals into community and primary care settings – and to simplify the patient journey.

These types of referral management scheme present considerable challenges to the secondary sector. They introduce a new tier between primary and secondary care and ultimately threaten to remove large parts of local acute Trusts’ work, particularly pre-assessment and diagnostics, and shift it to different settings altogether. Ultimately this may have serious implications for medical services in those trusts.

Naturally, the BMA’s Central Consultants and Specialists Committee has serious concerns about CATS and ICATS. It is encouraging medical staff and patients in these areas to participate in the CATS consultation which can be found at www.cumbriaandlancashirecats.nhs.uk, to be participate in planned public meetings and to raise the issues in their Trusts

The BMA believes this consultation to be totally inadequate, as it is largely about the logistics and location of the scheme, rather than about whether it needs to be provided by the independent sector, or indeed whether an additional tier in the local NHS is a good use of public money at all. Those decisions are not presented as up for public debate, either locally or nationally.

Some of the questions which need to be asked of CATS and ICATS are: -


We are raising all these questions and concerns at national level. For that we need reliable information from the local level. It would therefore be very helpful for any consultants affected by these plans to e-mail us information at info.ccsc@bma.org.uk or to contact their local BMA Industrial Relations Officer (via ask BMA) if concerned about the implications for them.

CCSC
19 January 2007